SEO tools
Do you like the term “search engine optimization”?
Whenever people ask me what I do in life I otveayu that “Internet marketing” rather than search engine optimization. 99 percent of the population, including many of the technically literate Internet users have no idea what SEO tools. Some people know transcript – search engine optimization, but in our industry so much incomprehensible that many who have heard about it, have a negative impression.
The last few years SEO industry has grown rapidly, and in the same way as any sphere of activity, has attracted a variety of merchants and scam artists who promote products and services of low quality to make a quick profit. Unlike most industries, outsiders seem unable to see the forest for the trees and a dysfunctional minority casts a shadow on our entire industry.
I think that the term “search engine optimization” is something of a defeat at the case. Many people think that it is – a euphemism for spam, but most people have never heard of it. What then we have a chance of success? I use the term “consultant on internet marketing,” which tells people that I provide consulting services on marketing on the Internet. No explanation is no longer required.
Just yesterday, the company TechCrunch, which usually had a fairly positive opinion about search engine optimization, and even ordered the service to the Pronet, an article describing the site, which, in their view, was “purely site SEO”, because he had little original content, and he was not a high-quality resource in the network. Was the site really good or bad – it does not matter a fact that they used the term “SEO” in a negative sense.
At Glam also has many pure “SEO sites, such as free-beauty-tips.com, celebrity-hairstyles.org and others. These sites generate a tremendous amount of traffic from search engine queries and give Comscore simply amazing stats, but absolutely do not have, as far as I can tell, no original content.
Why low-quality site automatically becomes a “site SEO”? Millions of people, producing a large number of sites of low quality, they know nothing about SEO tools.
For me the first rule of natural SEO – you do not have to waste time trying to move low-quality sites. If your site does not have any value, much better to put forces in the redesign of the site that visitors could get a good user experience than trying to throw some money in the optimization in the hope of getting a good rank. Some sites with low values have a high place, because they have a history, but if you run minimis site today, do not expect the traffic from Google.
Maybe we should try to actively fight against public opinion and still provide search engine optimization in a positive light, but with so many misunderstandings, I feel that it will advance a lost battle. Just look at the number of people who still pay money to have their sites added to 500,000 search engines, and it becomes clear that simply educating people is not enough.
What do you think? We must protect the term “search engine optimization” and try to convince the public or leave it alone and become instead “the consultants on internet marketing?